| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/06/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/06/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GÜTHS, M. F.; SIQUEIRA, H. A.; MONTES, J. H.; MOREIRA, F.; RIZZOTO, G.; PERIPOLLI, V.; TUTIDA, Y. H.; LUCIA JUNIOR, T.; IRGANG, R.; KICH, J. D.; BIANCHI, I. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCELO FELIPE GÜTHS, IFC/Araquari; HELLOA ALAIDE SIQUEIRA, IFC/Araquari; JULIA HELENA MONTES, IFC/Araquari; FABIANA MOREIRA, IFC/Araquari; GUILHERME RIZZOTO, UNESP; VANESSA PERIPOLLI, IFC/Araquari; YUSO HENRIQUE TUTIDA, IFC/Araquari; THOMAZ LUCIA JUNIOR, UFPel; RENATO IRGANG, UFSC; JALUSA DEON KICH, CNPSA; IVAN BIANCHI, IFC/Araquari. |
|
Título: |
Removal or substitution of in feed antimicrobials in swine production. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Preventive Veterinary Medicine, n. 205, ed. 105696, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105696 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Antimicrobial substitutes are being used in pig production systems, to maintain the health of the animals without compromising their performance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of either the removal of in feed antimicrobials or their substitution for feed additives, at the nursery and growing/finishing stages. At weaning, 1091 piglets were sexed, vaccinated, homogenized by weight and allocated to six treatments during the nursery stage (26?63 d): T1- feed with no antimicrobials nor additives; T2 - feed with antimicrobials; T3 - feed with prebiotic; T4 ? feed with probiotic; T5 ? feed with essential oils; T6 ? feed with organic acids. The same treatments were applied to 840 pigs during the growing/finishing stages (64?167 d). There was no effect of the treatments on feed conversion at the nursery (P = 0.222) and the growing/finishing (P = 0.809) stages. The average daily gain did not differ across treatments in the nursery (P = 0.342) and in growing/finishing (P = 0.050). The cost of the interventions with injectable drugs was not different between the treatments neither at the nursery (P = 0.990) nor at the growing/finishing (P = 0.310). However, the pneumonia and pleurisy index for all treatments was equal or above 1.0, which indicates a respiratory challenge. There was an increase in the cost with antimicrobials or additives per kg of feed produced, which impacts the cost per kg of pig produced. In conclusion, the removal of antimicrobials in pig diets is financially feasible and their substitution by additives did not impact growing performance. MenosAbstract: Antimicrobial substitutes are being used in pig production systems, to maintain the health of the animals without compromising their performance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of either the removal of in feed antimicrobials or their substitution for feed additives, at the nursery and growing/finishing stages. At weaning, 1091 piglets were sexed, vaccinated, homogenized by weight and allocated to six treatments during the nursery stage (26?63 d): T1- feed with no antimicrobials nor additives; T2 - feed with antimicrobials; T3 - feed with prebiotic; T4 ? feed with probiotic; T5 ? feed with essential oils; T6 ? feed with organic acids. The same treatments were applied to 840 pigs during the growing/finishing stages (64?167 d). There was no effect of the treatments on feed conversion at the nursery (P = 0.222) and the growing/finishing (P = 0.809) stages. The average daily gain did not differ across treatments in the nursery (P = 0.342) and in growing/finishing (P = 0.050). The cost of the interventions with injectable drugs was not different between the treatments neither at the nursery (P = 0.990) nor at the growing/finishing (P = 0.310). However, the pneumonia and pleurisy index for all treatments was equal or above 1.0, which indicates a respiratory challenge. There was an increase in the cost with antimicrobials or additives per kg of feed produced, which impacts the cost per kg of pig produced. In conclusion, the removal of antimicrobials in pig... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Prebióticos; Probióticos. |
|
Thesagro: |
Ácido Orgânico; Controle Microbiano; Óleo Essencial; Produção Animal; Ração; Suíno. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Essential oils; Organic acids and salts; Prebiotics; Probiotics. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02703naa a2200397 a 4500
001 2144317
005 2022-06-28
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105696$2DOI
100 1 $aGÜTHS, M. F.
245 $aRemoval or substitution of in feed antimicrobials in swine production.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aAbstract: Antimicrobial substitutes are being used in pig production systems, to maintain the health of the animals without compromising their performance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of either the removal of in feed antimicrobials or their substitution for feed additives, at the nursery and growing/finishing stages. At weaning, 1091 piglets were sexed, vaccinated, homogenized by weight and allocated to six treatments during the nursery stage (26?63 d): T1- feed with no antimicrobials nor additives; T2 - feed with antimicrobials; T3 - feed with prebiotic; T4 ? feed with probiotic; T5 ? feed with essential oils; T6 ? feed with organic acids. The same treatments were applied to 840 pigs during the growing/finishing stages (64?167 d). There was no effect of the treatments on feed conversion at the nursery (P = 0.222) and the growing/finishing (P = 0.809) stages. The average daily gain did not differ across treatments in the nursery (P = 0.342) and in growing/finishing (P = 0.050). The cost of the interventions with injectable drugs was not different between the treatments neither at the nursery (P = 0.990) nor at the growing/finishing (P = 0.310). However, the pneumonia and pleurisy index for all treatments was equal or above 1.0, which indicates a respiratory challenge. There was an increase in the cost with antimicrobials or additives per kg of feed produced, which impacts the cost per kg of pig produced. In conclusion, the removal of antimicrobials in pig diets is financially feasible and their substitution by additives did not impact growing performance.
650 $aEssential oils
650 $aOrganic acids and salts
650 $aPrebiotics
650 $aProbiotics
650 $aÁcido Orgânico
650 $aControle Microbiano
650 $aÓleo Essencial
650 $aProdução Animal
650 $aRação
650 $aSuíno
653 $aPrebióticos
653 $aProbióticos
700 1 $aSIQUEIRA, H. A.
700 1 $aMONTES, J. H.
700 1 $aMOREIRA, F.
700 1 $aRIZZOTO, G.
700 1 $aPERIPOLLI, V.
700 1 $aTUTIDA, Y. H.
700 1 $aLUCIA JUNIOR, T.
700 1 $aIRGANG, R.
700 1 $aKICH, J. D.
700 1 $aBIANCHI, I.
773 $tPreventive Veterinary Medicine$gn. 205, ed. 105696, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
